Tag Archives: Uncategorized

Unknown's avatar

Another untraditional QB

by
Yesterday I commented on how I think God has lifted Tebow up, but has done it in such a way as only God can receive the glory-and then Tebow can bask in that. The polarization of Tebow stems partially from his outspoken Christianity.
But some of his larger critics are in fact professing Christians. Former Buc’s QB, Trent Dilfer is certainly one of them. I’m not surprised that “the Dilf” has taken issue with Tebow because he is a fellow brother in the Lord. I’m surprised that “the Dilf” has taken issue with Tebow because “the Dilf” was not a traditional quarterback either. Or at least not a “traditionally” good QB. You don’t typically win a Super Bowl and then get cut by your team soon afterwards if you are a good QB. Yet he did. Then he went on to Seattle, to Cleveland, to San Francisco. Traditionally good QB’s don’t pack their bags that often.
Yet “the Dilf” won a super bowl with the Ravens when his replacement couldn’t win games. The replacement the following year just didn’t work, and they didn’t enjoy the same success as they had with “the Dilf.”
“The Dilf” was far from a traditional QB because he wasn’t asked to win the game. He was told “to manage” the game. That’s it. Don’t lose it, just manage it. He was a “non-traditional” QB, who temporarily was lifted up despite his lack of “traditional” QB skills.
He was lifted up, winning the highest honor a QB can have: a super bowl victory. Yet he couldn’t boast in how well he played because the defense was clearly the ones who would receive the most glory. Lifted up and then humbly cut just months later. 
So that is why its so surprising that “the Dilf” has become such a Tebow “hater.” They are not only brothers in the Lord; they are brothers in the “non-traditional” QB family. 

When we forget that we’ve been lifted up ONLY because of Jesus’ good pleasure (even the good things we do are ultimately produced through His power-Phil 2:11-12), we will not only be prone to arrogance, but prone to disdain the grace and joy of others who’ve been humbly lifted up as well.

Unknown's avatar

Tebow, Israel, and when God "humbly lifts us up"

by

Yesterday was a crazy football day. Not because the Bucs lost, again, which I think I should be getting used to by now (false hope is terrible!), but because Tim Tebow and his Bronco’s won again. He’s now 3-1 as a starter. The guy who most analysts pull against because he is not a “traditional” quarterback, is now 3-1 and his team is still in a play-off race. But only because of the weak division that is the AFC West.


He actually completed 2 passes yesterday. He was 0-4 in the first half and eventually finished 2 for 8. Yet his team one again. 

I really don’t think God cares that much about football. We see certain places in the scriptures that seem to suggest God does have a “special place in his heart” for widows, orphans, and the oppressed (Psalm 68:5). But it is also true he has a special place in His heart for His children the way any good father does. And he cares about their sanctification even more than their “success” (Romans 8:28). So that includes Tebow, as it does any Christian in the world or in the NFL for that matter.

And isn’t it funny how God shows love, how he both lifts up and humbles at the same time? You can’t get much worse than 2 for 8. Yet his team won. God lifted Tebow up, but he did it in such a way as he couldn’t rest upon his individual stats. God lifted him up in such a way that Tebow would know it wasn’t his efforts. And I think today Tebow is just fine with it. 

God has been doing this for some time. He lifted up Israel, and made sure they knew that they were chosen not because of anything IN them, but simply because, well, He chose to love them (Deuteronomy 7:5-7).

So he lifted up Israel, but not in the “traditional” way that He did for opposing nations-by sheer might and power. Remember, he had them shout down the walls of Jericho after marching around it 6 times. How untraditional? Frankly it would have been a quite humbling victory if they were thinking about “individual stats.” Shouting? A battering ram would have been much cooler to me. 

God lifted them up in victory and at the same time humbled them.

From what we can tell, Israel actually rose to power because there was a power vacuum in the Ancient Near East-similar to the AFC West division. It wasn’t Israel’s might and power that did it. And I would argue that was by design. 

The goal of God lifting us up is never simply so that we can be lifted up. It’s always His glory. And so when you are lifted up, keep looking in that same direction. There’s a reason that God lifts people up, and doesn’t allow them to have great “stats.” You can then freely bask in God’s glory instead of your own. 
Unknown's avatar

Jerry West and the burden of being thought a hero

by

You’ve probably heard about how Penn State hero Joe Paterno has tripped over the wake of destroyed lives of which he has had a large part to play. No longer is he the hero. He’s the goat. And a sadder more perverse thing I cannot dream of happening in college sports. I’m truly “speechless” from my computer.


I would guess one of the more currently heroic West Virginia natives would have to be former NBA star Jerry West. Pretty soon it could be Andrew Luck, the Stanford QB, and probable number 1 overall pick in the NFL draft next spring. But for right now, the man who IS the NBA logo (or rather the logo is him), probably takes the cake. 


I listened to a rare impressive local interview with Jerry a month or so ago. Then this article came out a few weeks ago regarding Jerry West and his depression. 

Some people like to be heroes until they are eventually, like Joe Pa, dethroned. Many others simply realize that they are not heroes. Role models for sure, but heroes is much tougher. That’s a burden that’s quite a bit too heavy to carry. 

Jerry West’s new book West by West: My Charmed Tormented Life apparently reveals the darker side of Jerry and his struggle through depression. 

Most people writing memoirs/autobiography want more money. But probably part of the memoir/biography craze is a desire to be known. For people to know the truth about them, that there is more going on inside of them than what everyone else sees. It’s hard to be a hero because we weren’t meant to be heroes. We were meant to be have dominion over the earth and be “vice-kings/queens” but not heroes (Gen 1:27-28). 

There is one hero to the story and his name is Jesus.

Deep down inside people will suppress that truth, but they can only suppress it so far. The burden becomes too heavy and out comes the junk. I think that’s why people like Steve Jobbs can give the OK on books which make them look less than “heroic.”It’s why I would want my depression story in any biography of me (not quite sure that would sell though…) 

Any book written about you or I would eventually paint us in less “heroic” colors than much of the outside world sees. And that’s OK. It doesn’t mean we necessarily think less of the person, but instead that we realize that they still need Jesus. A lot. Whoever they are, wherever they are, they still need Jesus. 

The burden of perfect and outwardly respectable performance for the Christian need not be ours to carry. Even though I think we do bear more of the burden than we let on (by refusing to recognize our weaknesses and sins), Jesus regularly speaks to us through His word and says, “Enough is enough. Let ME carry that burden (Matt 11:28-30).”

You can let others know your mess and how much you need Jesus because you don’t need to be a hero. You don’t need people to think more of you. In fact, in the end, we find it far more enjoyable for people to think less of us and more of Jesus. Deep down inside, even though I don’t where West stands with Jesus, I think that’s what his heart ultimately wants.

In the end, Jerry West and Tina Turner have a lot in common. One sings, and another one says, “We don’t need another hero.”
Unknown's avatar

Sensitivity training?

by

While I’m still not comfortable enough to place myself solely within ONE Christian counseling “camp,” I’ve recently been encouraged and become more and more impressed by the work of the CCEF folks. 


Here is an audio clip of Dr. David Powlison and Andrew Ray from their “Help and Hope.” It’s only 9 minutes long and an easy listen-not to be confused with “easy listening” music of course. You’ll have to get past their very quite, soft, and gentle voices that remind me of the ladies from the S.N.L. sketch “Delicious Dish.”


These two lads tackle an incredibly practical question from a listener to their show: “How can I stop being over-sensitive?” 

Wouldn’t that be nice? I think I can be over-sensitive at times and under-sensitive at others. In this short discussion, you can see that the answer is not to become more “thick skinned,” as Jon Gruden told his former player Keyshawn Johnson even though he was being “thin skinned” in his retort. Nor is the answer to let over-sensitivity rule the day and ignore the fact that sensitivity turned inward neglects Jesus. It is the best answer I’ve heard to date regarding this question.

I told someone the other day that I’m good at diagnosing problems, but not as good at providing the solution. I actually said it in connection to this very question. Now at least I feel more prepared at redeeming and embracing a gospel centered sensitivity. 

Here are a few notes I jotted down while listening to this helpful resource. I hope they will whet your appetite for a 9 minute dinner.
  • sensitivity is one of God’s greatest gifts
  • sensitivity turned inward takes God out of the picture and we’re left with you and me and what you think of me
  • thick skinned is basically the same as being callous; not a good goal to shoot for
  • Jesus is the High Priest who is able to sympathize with our weakness
  • We can turn sympathy tables around; because we are so loved, we don’t focus our sensitivity inward
  • The goal is to be safer in Christ and more thin skinned toward FOR others 
Unknown's avatar

Gospel Centered Risk

by

I’ve had a heart for church planting for some time now. I can’t point to a time or day, but over time I felt convinced of the need for it, that it is the best way for the gospel to go forth and change a city. If you worship at Redeemer, you can’t help but recognize the need for church planting. At one point, not too long ago, there was no PCA, or even Reformed work in Teays Valley. Now there is. And there wouldn’t have been if God hadn’t called a man and his family to come up here. And take that risk. By default, you recognize the need for more gospel centered churches.

Church planting is a risk. Sometimes God calls us into risks that we don’t understand. Sometimes those risks work out the way we pray. Sometimes not. But we don’t receive a special wisdom from heaven that means we can figure out how to follow Jesus so things just “fall into place.”
We have to take risks. We don’t have to take risks because God won’t like us if we don’t take risks. We have to take risks, because if we don’t, we really don’t believe the gospel all that much. For instance, we really are free to fail-not have the desired outcome from a certain risk. We can try things that may or may not “work.” For instance, we can introduce a new ministry opportunity, and experience the frustration of no one or only a few showing up, and still wake up the next day with a smile on our face. We can be thankful for the none or the few. We can present the gospel sloppily, love someone much older/younger, ask a girl out who will possibly say, “No,” try our hand at teaching a class we don’t feel qualified, lead with some uncomfortable uncertainty when our leadership is needed, because the gospel reminds us that God’s love for us doesn’t fail us. Ever. Even when we sin.
When we don’t take risks, it says, “I believe I can fail, but I’m just not willing to find out if that’s actually true.”  It reveals an underlying disbelief in the gospel. And to really love a people, a community, a church is ALWAYS a risk. Always. You don’t know how your moving toward them will end for you. But taking risks is part of God’s design.
We can’t follow God without taking risks. And I’m not talking about stock market risk. Gospel-centered risk. Risking something for God’s glory that is so great, that without Him blessing it, it will fail. Here’s a story of great risk which one family took for the spread of the gospel by means of church planting in New York City. And it didn’t “work.” It “failed” in the sense that the desired outcome was different than the actual outcome. The church closed. It’s sad. But it didn’t really fail. The risk takers who partnered through their prayers, pocketbooks, and presence, didn’t really fail. 
The true story, as written by a friend and former seminary buddy, is amazing. It is a story of a pastor who loved, who took the risk of planting, pastoring, and then having to move on. 
Read the story. It will do your soul good. Here’s an excerpt.
But even as we move forward I don’t want to forget Flatbush and I’m grateful that my experience there will make it hard to do that. I’m most grateful that John and Kathy were willing to take the risk. I wouldn’t have done it. But then again I wouldn’t have so eagerly given up a kidney to a fellow parishioner. But John did. I wouldn’t have so easily jumped out of bed at 1 AM to drive the streets of Brooklyn looking for a kid from my church. But John did. I wouldn’t have joyfully tackled the endless laundry list of responsibilities that come with being a solo pastor of a church plant in an urban neighborhood. But John did. And so now maybe I will.
Why God allowed such a church to close, when he allows others to remain on life support because one or two wealthy folks go there, I don’t know. But this story challenges me. How much do I believe the gospel? A lack of risk-taking in life reveals a lack of not just faith in WHAT GOD WILL DO, but faith in WHAT GOD HAS ALREADY DONE in the gospel. We can take risks if we are confident in what Jesus has done for us. We can “fail,” and yet not fail at the same time.
Unknown's avatar

When to tell someone, "This may not be the right church for you."

by

I really appreciate my “facebook friend” (he might not be able to pick me out in a line-up of former Buccaneer quarterbacks Brad Johnson-I’ve been told I look like him-Rob Johnson and Josh Johnson) Ed Stetzer. Yet I could be wrong, because he is one my few followers on Twitter! Anyhow, he works for Lifeway Research as well as writes, speaks, and promotes church planting. Some church leaders  involved in leading church planting efforts like Tim Keller and Mark Driscoll do so from their senior pastor platforms, by writing, speaking, and forming church planting networks. Stetzer frequently speaks at the church planting networks, but is also personally assisting in planting a church now. So he has a special place in my heart, and has had such a place since I met him in a breakout session at the National Outreach Conference in San Diego 2008.

When it comes to planting a church-and I think this applies to most established churches as well but not to same level of necessity-leaders and committed core group members have to be on their guard for what he calls “Issue Christians.” Someone camp up to Ed after the service the other day and wondered why more churches don’t speak about “prophesy” in the way that John Haggee and Jack Van Impe do. Immediately the “issue” radar went off. Here is a pastoral response that really makes sense to me, and is probably more loving for both the “issue Christian” and the church.

Honestly, if this person were unchurched and told me they thought highly of Deepak Chopra and Wayne Dyer, I would have sought a point of contact and encouraged further discussion. I probably would have tried to get together– if they were open– to see what the Bible says about the kinds of things that Wayne Dyer talks about. I would have used the bridge to talk about Jesus. However, in this case, I simply said something like, “We are not one of those churches that you would think talks about prophecy enough– this would not be the right church for you, but I do hope your search for a church home goes well.”

You see, I don’t spend a lot of time with “issue Christians.” It’s not just the issue of prophecy either. I’ve had similar conversations with “issue Calvinists,” “issue political Christians,” “issue charismatics,” “issue homeschoolers,” and many others. These are often good people and those are important issues, but when these are the primary defining issues in the first (and every other) conversation, the correct response is help them move on and do so quickly.  

You can read more of his justification for such response here. But this is just one that stuck out.

3. Some “issue Christians” drift from church to church looking for willing ears–you do not need to let that in your church.
“Issue Christians” love to debate and display their knowledge. It is not good stewardship of your time to have these debates and you are not being a good steward of your church to let them loose inside.

Sensitivity to individuals needs is extremely important. When Jesus describes the people who are invited to his Great Banquet, he describes people in unflattering terms (Luke 14:21). We’re spiritually disheveled and dilapidated and desperately still in need of Jesus. As a result we welcome folks who are spiritually and/or physically in a similar condition. 

However when a church comprises folks who expect to come and have their particular issue coddled, preached about, encouraged, or enforced, it will not go well. Division will be next in line and all parties will end up bitter and the focus will be taken off of Christ and His mission. Thankful for the many pastors who care about Jesus’ mission so much, that they will boldly love and protect their flock and their mission field.
Unknown's avatar

Rake-A-Thon

by

On Sunday afternoon, youth from our church gathered together for the 87th (that joke NEVER gets old-at least to me) annual Teays Valley Rake-a-Thon. We had previously solicited any folks interested to sign up or to let us know of needs in our community. Some folks took us up on the offer and we actually had a few ladies outside the church, as well as several folks from our congregation.


When I gathered the yutes together, I explained that what we were doing that day was actually just as “spiritual” as having a bible study. We gathered together to do this in order to apply what the bible actually says. I quoted them James 1:27 where “true religion” involves such things as this. I told them we would be visiting widows, or folks in distress, though we might not be seeing any orphans. 

The Lord blessed with us absolutely gorgeous weather, and a nice crowd to where we could actually split up into 5 teams. But perhaps even better were the attitudes before and after. Some youth were actually posting on facebook that they were looking forward to it. Crazy.

After we got back and looked at before/after pics to determine the winner, good feedback soon trickled in. One lady, tickled pink someone would come rake her yard, was blown away by the youth response: “thanks for letting us rake your yard!”

Another lady currently experienced a very serious traumatic event and was blown away that people she didn’t know would show such love. Jesus was in this for sure.

Below I’ve listed some reasons why I think these things are so important

1.) Unless you’re a Methodist church, your church may not be as good at mercy as you think. That’s a caricature of course. But many churches are heading in what I consider the right direction. Our church formed a women’s ministry called “Kindness in Action.” It’s just some ladies showing kindness and mercy to those in and outside the church. How cool is that? 

2.) You learn and teach not simply by “classroom” type study, but by actually doing. We want to teach our youth and families that God is honored with such activity by actually doing those things. As Presbyterians, I think we undervalue the role of “doing” in our teaching. Doing does teach. When you regularly choose to skip church because of sports or sleep or busyness or activities, you ARE teaching something. Equally important in Christian Education is this “doing” component. Even more, Tim Keller points out that as we serve our communities with our “hands,” we can really “work the gospel” deeper into our “hearts.” As we serve those in need, we begin to grasp the gospel even more.

3.) Regular religious instruction in this area has to start early. Our aim is not simply to keep the kids off the streets but to prepare them to leave the home. The goal in regularly doing things like this is to make service a regular part of their Christian lives from here on out. I can remember how a young Methodist girl involved with our campus ministry at Furman and help us better apply the gospel with our “hands” from the very get-go. As a freshmen she organized a service event for all. Connar and Jude, our 3 and 4 year old workers will only know (ideally) a Christian faith that seeks the good of others, not just a personal experience with God detached from community.

4.) When one’s Christian life actually makes a difference in the lives of others, he/she will becomes less burdened with the unscriptural mantra which destroys marriages, friendships, and other commitments: “God ultimately wants me to be happy.” Somehow, the whole, “Love God and Love others thing seems to get replaced with a God who promotes love of self and personal fulfillment. Somehow in this new Oprah-esque paradigm, God actually excuses sin because he simply wants us to be happy. Yet the ironic thing is that if we enter into suffering and don’t center our lives around self-fulfillment, you’ll find more joy. Most don’t get past the suffering part because God exists to make them happy and thus forfeit real joy.

5.) Community makes things more fun. I don’t have a scripture reference for this; but I don’t need one. We know this is true. Community can make a mundane job like raking leaves for others quite fun and fulfilling. Do the same thing in your yard, by yourself, well, not so much fun. Particularly when they are 100% your neighbor’s leaves…..

Unknown's avatar

Luther and Hero worship

by

Hope that everyone had a good Halloween/Reformation Day. We had some great opportunities to connect with neighbors and find out exactly where those folks we see walking actually live. Everyone was outside so that mad it quite easy.


October 31st, as most folks know, is also the day that that much of the Protestant Reformation got kick-started (however there were pre-cursors to Luther like Jan Huss who actually paid the ultimate sacrifice) and so many rightfully celebrated and still celebrate that fact. We should celebrate that God used folks to “just say no” (not sure that they used that Nancy Reagan-esque slogan though) to Rome and its corruption, and the need to Reform the Church. 


And we should not stop celebrating the fact that God used feeble folks-and still does fortunately-to do just that. In turn, we should also not forget that such men were feeble and probably do not want us putting them up on a pedestal. 


One of my favorite Shakespeare quotes comes from Marc Antony’s (the original, not the dude freshly divorced from J-Lo) soliloquy after some lads killed Julius Caesar: “the evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones…” In other words, people forget the good stuff you do, and remember the bad. We’ve all experienced that.


The bible has in essence one hero: Jesus. The rest of the characters aren’t heroes, and that’s why their flaws are presented to us. We do tend to moralize them. We do that with current “celebrity pastors” and speakers. And Reformed folks tend to that with Puritans and Reformers. 


Let me speak regarding the latter.


Martin Luther had a boldness few of us have ever seen. He had a love of Jesus many of us don’t regularly see. But he also, like the rest of us, had plenty of flaws. We do both Jesus and Luther a disservice-since he so well has pointed us to our need for Jesus lo these many years-when we ignore his flaws. 


Here are some things we can learn from the mistakes of Martin Luther from scholar Dr. Frank James,  formerly at R.T.S., but now with Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary.


1.) Demonizing. Luther was confident in the gospel, but he may have placed confidence in other areas so much so, that he demonized his opponents who were ultimately in the same fight with only subtle nuances. In fact he writes positively about Ulrich Zwingli’s death in battle, as though it were a just and good thing.


2.) Anti-Semitic. In Luther’s On the Jews and Their Lies. We were read an excerpt in seminary. Pretty rough stuff. 


3) Unwillingness to recognize blind spots. There’s a reason that Lutherans don’t exactly hold to a Lutheran understanding of justification and pre-destination. Philip Melancthon was his golden boy, and didn’t hold Luther’s view on either. Unfortunately Luther failed to see it. As a result, at least in part,  Presbyterians, some Baptists, and several others take Luther’s theology more seriously than Lutherans. Kind of ironic. 


In the end, Luther was and is a saint like you and I. His theology, his life can teach us a lot. And we should learn all we can from this lad. But his theology at times, incorrectly applied or not applied in certain areas, can also teach us we too can be quite inconsistent in applying theology to our lives. The hero of the story is not us, not them, it’s Jesus. We can’t forget that. I can’t forget that, particularly with my pastoral idolatry. And Luther wouldn’t want us to forget that, I’m sure. 


We learned very little about John Calvin’s “dirt,” much to my dismay. So I’ve got nothing on him. But both he and Luther are now, not just declared righteous, they actually are righteous. So that’s why I think neither of them would be upset that I’m writing this. 


The good news is that God uses flawed people to build His Kingdom. So you’re in good company when you enlist-or rather “get drafted.”

Unknown's avatar

Yearly Halloween thoughts (amended)

by

Someone just asked me today if our church did some sort of Halloween alternative activity. I let him know that we don’t have a building, so that makes it harder (though not impossible by any means). But I also let him know that I didn’t feel there would have been that much interest anyway-as I perceive it.


As I’ve noticed over the years, Christians in different areas of the nation have different “taboo’s”: convictions that have been elevated so high that for many they are just understood. I really can’t figure it out, but I’m as intrigued as I’m perplexed about it.

I dropped Connar off to his pre-school today in his fireman costume. Most kids dressed up for this “Harvest Party.” They’ll get candy. Amy is going in today to do some pumpkin activity. This is a Baptist church. Another fairly, or very legalistic church in the valley where women have to wear dresses, say nothing against Halloween and has no Halloween alternative. It’s just not taboo in this area.

But in South Carolina, and in parts of Florida, scores of churches had Halloween alternatives. It was understood that Halloween celebration outside the church was not kosher. Or at least that’s the vibe I got.

Yet in FL, alcohol consumption in moderation is not taboo. But in my area, for many churches and Christian schools in the area, it is. Although somehow cigarettes and chewing tobacco for some reason isn’t…..Other areas Christians consider cussing as “a” or THE sign that you are an unbeliever, while in some parts, it can be appropriate in private conversation.

Christians should have convictions and not just respond as oysters (filter feeders who suck everything in) to the culture. If there are holidays or just any day, where they our communities say, “Let’s get naked and go to bath houses,” then stay home and keep the lights on. Early Christians were insulted because they didn’t go get naked with their neighbors. They really did get insulted for this.

However, we also shouldn’t simply respond to the “taboo” mentality of local or state “church culture.”And if you do choose to celebrate, and people think you’re wrong, it doesn’t matter. You don’t have to prove that “you’re right” and “they’re wrong.” I just preached on that yesterday. We often have opinions that we hold on too tightly, and by doing so, let real cultural values contrary to the gospel, quietly seep into the church. I wonder if Satan really does like Halloween as much as some folks say, but for different reasons: division, pride, and self-righteousness on BOTH SIDES of the issue.

I’m much more concerned about playing sports on Sundays, and how quickly people culturally cave to whatever the community event it is when it coincides with worship. 

If you choose to celebrate Halloween, and trick-or-treat with your kids, I’m pretty sure no one is going to come up to you and say, “Hey, you’re a pagan like me. Awesome, can we talk Druid stuff, or whatever the perceived origins (I stopped counting how many different “authorities” claimed THEY knew the true origin) and how we both are bringing mother nature, or Satan, or someone other than God glory tonight?” You can read about folks like that here. If they do, consider it a blessing to have the conversation and one that is pretty easy to steer that one toward Jesus.

If you do celebrate Halloween, and you haven’t yet-our area is incredibly unique (some neighborhoods have already had their trick-or-treat night)- here are some good ways to “bring Jesus” with you as you go to and fro. 

If you choose not to “celebrate” it, that’s fine too. You can still care about your neighbors, serve and bless them on other nights. In my opinion, you miss one opportunity; but it is not the ONLY opportunity.
Unknown's avatar

Gay, Proud, and Presbyterian

by
Last week or so, the Presbyterian denomination P.C.U.S.A., ordained the first openly gay minister. You can watch the interview here. Its pretty sad, because I have family members, in-laws, and friends in PCUSA churches as members and ministers. Those churches don’t feel this same way, but perhaps the day is coming when they must recognize that they can’t have real fellowship with those in their own denomination. Crazy.
If the bible is “silent” on homosexuality, on what issues is it “loud?” Or if there are different ways of interpreting the bible (called a “hermenuetic”), which allow us to pick and choose what we follow, then I’d keep the homosexual part in play but throw out the whole love your enemies part. That’s one I don’t like all that much. It’s hard. But I don’t get a vote, and I’m glad.
Anyhow, here are a few takes from this video
1.) What is Liberalism? A friend of mine, when being accused of being a “liberal,” was asked, “What is the difference between you and liberal mainline Christianity?” He answered, “I stand UNDER God’s Word as the final authority.” A typical liberal mainline minister will stand OVER God’s Word to critique it.
2.) At what point is a church no longer a church? The Reformers gave three marks of a church: Preaching of Word, Administration of Sacraments, and Church Discipline. When the word is preached in such a way that is not the final authority, then it would be tough to argue that is being preached at all. How many liberal churches are truly churches? I don’t know, but something to consider.
Of course in my denomination, we have to ask that question as well. Just because a group of people have a building, that says, “Church” on it, is that gathering legitimately a church? Is it a church when there are 6 people, 20 people? Is there a cut-off? Should we consider it a bible study that meets Sunday mornings? So we have that question as well, but it becomes more difficult when theological fidelity is present, and perhaps the Holy Spirit absent. Again I don’t have answers, but just want to point out that theological orthodoxy does not in and of itself make or maintain a church.
3.) Language games. It is not hard to say the correct theological terms and mean something completely different. A plethora of German scholars in the late 1700’s-1800’s had one foot in a “conservative camp” with their words, but in their meanings, they paved the way for a severe lingering suspicion of the scriptures. They would say things like, “Jesus is my Savior,” but mean that Jesus was important to them. You can also say things like “God’s Word is my authority, but I just don’t think the bible speaks against homosexuality.” Again, a language game.
4.) What’s the difference? When a church is so identifiable with the cultural stance or perhaps even a political one, can it then turn around and say anything true about the gospel or people’s need for it? How is it different than a social club worshiping a deity that it finds palatable? I’m actually kind of curious to visit such a church, but on the four Sundays I have off each year, I’d rather hear God’s Word preached faithfully.
5.) Many Christians literally struggle with same sex attraction. While some folks have pronounced victory in this fight, there are other Christians who affirm homosexual sex is contrary to God’s will, and as a result fight each day to live faithful to the Lord who has bought them with the price of His blood. This book, Washed and Waiting, is one of the best books I’ve read this year. In it you’ll hear of a normal dude struggling in this area, yet trusting in Christ to forgive and empower him. I felt for this brother in Christ. How must he feel when other “Christians” choose to ignore God’s commands and good design and profess to be saved by and follow the same Savior? And then celebrate their “victory.”
The evangelical church probably still has a ways to go. To condemn and affirm sin is one thing, but to not welcome, not affirm the dignity, to provide blanket assumptions for why folks are gay, and to not befriend and get to know other fellow sinners (but ones yet to experience grace) misses Jesus as well.